Argumentace na téma Music a vzor na výbornou

 

U maturitní ústní zkoušky z angličtiny se může v rámci tématu Music (Hudba) objevit i zadání, ve kterém budete muset anglicky argumentovat na nějaké tvrzení (statement) či názor (opinion). Jelikož tvrzení a názory neznají žádné limity – někdy se nám mohou líbit, a někdy nám mohou připadat zcela nepřijatelné – není vždy jednoduché se k nim vyjádřit někdy i v rodném jazyce, natož v angličtině. V takovém zadání po vás může zkoušející například chtít, abyste k nějakému tvrzení vyjádřili svůj souhlas či nesouhlas, nebo vyjádřili to, že jste v dané věci neutrální apod., a především, abyste vaše mluvení podpořili argumenty. Pojďme se na argumentaci, na toto spíše těžší zadání, podívat a mrkněme také na vzorové vypracování, ve kterém se podíváme na více názorových variant.

maturita-anglictina-amos-itutoring-top-content

Tvrzení pro argumentaci na téma Hudba (Music)

  1. The rise of streaming services has devalued music.
  2. Music education should be mandatory in schools.
  3. Auto-tune is ruining the quality of modern music.
  4. Cultural appropriation in music is a serious problem.
  5. The music industry is too focused on profit rather than artistic expression.
  6. Popular music today is less creative than it was in the past.
  7. Streaming platforms are unfair to independent artists.
  8. Music with explicit content should be censored.
  9. AI-generated music lacks the soul of human-created music.
  10. The dominance of English in global music is diminishing cultural diversity.

Vzorové argumentace na tvrzení na téma Hudba (Music) výše

1. The rise of streaming services has devalued music.

Opinion 1: I think streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music have made music less valuable in some ways. When people can listen to millions of songs for a small monthly fee, they might not appreciate each song as much. It’s like music has become too easy to get, so people don’t think about how much work goes into making it. Plus, artists don’t earn much money from streaming, which isn’t fair because they spend so much time and effort creating music. I believe we should support musicians more by buying their albums or going to their concerts.

Opinion 2: On the other hand, I believe streaming services have made music more valuable because they give everyone access to a huge variety of songs. Before streaming, it was hard to discover new music unless you bought CDs or listened to the radio. Now, we can easily explore different genres and find new artists we love. Streaming also helps smaller, independent musicians reach a bigger audience without needing a big record label. So, while the way we value music might have changed, I don’t think it’s been devalued.


2. Music education should be mandatory in schools.

Opinion 1: I totally agree that music education should be mandatory in schools. Learning music helps students develop important skills like creativity, discipline, and teamwork. It’s not just about playing an instrument or singing; music education also improves memory and problem-solving abilities. Plus, music can be a great way for students to express themselves and relieve stress. Not every student will become a musician, but the skills they learn in music class can be useful in many areas of life.

Opinion 2: While I think music education is important, I’m not sure it should be mandatory in schools. Not every student is interested in music, and some might find it boring or difficult. Schools should offer music classes as an option, but students should be able to choose what they want to study based on their interests. Some students might prefer to focus on sports, art, or science instead. Making music mandatory could take time away from other subjects that students might find more valuable for their future careers.


3. Auto-tune is ruining the quality of modern music.

Opinion 1: I believe auto-tune is ruining the quality of modern music because it makes everything sound fake. When singers use too much auto-tune, it’s hard to tell if they actually have talent or if the technology is doing all the work. I miss the days when music felt more authentic, and you could hear the real emotions in a singer’s voice. Now, it seems like anyone can become a pop star with the help of auto-tune, which takes away from the true artistry of music.

Opinion 2: I don’t think auto-tune is ruining music; it’s just another tool that artists can use to create their sound. Some people use it creatively to make interesting and unique music that wouldn’t be possible otherwise. Not all music needs to be 100% natural. Music is about expression, and if auto-tune helps an artist express their ideas better, then why not use it? Plus, some listeners really enjoy the futuristic and polished sound that auto-tune can create.


4. Cultural appropriation in music is a serious problem.

Opinion 1: Cultural appropriation in music is definitely a problem because it often disrespects the culture being borrowed from. When artists take elements from another culture without understanding or respecting its significance, it can be hurtful to the people from that culture. For example, using traditional music styles or clothing in a way that stereotypes or commercializes a culture can lead to misunderstandings and reinforce negative ideas. I think artists should be more mindful and respectful when incorporating other cultures into their music.

Opinion 2: While cultural appropriation can be an issue, I don’t think it’s always a serious problem. Music has always been about sharing and blending different influences, and that’s how new genres and styles are created. Sometimes, artists are inspired by other cultures and want to celebrate them through their music. As long as they do it respectfully and give credit to the original culture, I think it can be a positive thing. After all, music is a universal language that connects people from different backgrounds.


5. The music industry is too focused on profit rather than artistic expression.

Opinion 1: I think the music industry is definitely too focused on making money rather than supporting true artistic expression. Many record labels only care about what will sell, so they push artists to make songs that fit a certain formula instead of letting them create something unique. This is why a lot of popular music sounds the same and lacks originality. It’s frustrating because there are so many talented artists who don’t get a chance to share their work because it’s not considered “marketable.”

Opinion 2: While it’s true that the music industry is a business and profit is important, I don’t think that means there’s no room for artistic expression. Many artists still manage to create meaningful and original music, even within the commercial system. Plus, with the rise of independent artists and platforms like YouTube and Bandcamp, more musicians can share their art without being controlled by big labels. It’s up to the listeners to support the music they believe in, whether it’s mainstream or not.


6. Popular music today is less creative than it was in the past.

Opinion 1: I think popular music today is less creative than it was in the past. A lot of songs on the radio sound very similar, with the same beats, lyrics, and themes. It feels like artists are just copying what’s already been done instead of trying something new. When I listen to older music, like from the 60s or 70s, I hear more diversity in styles and more meaningful lyrics. I wish modern music would take more risks and be more original.

Opinion 2: I disagree that popular music today is less creative. While some songs might sound similar, there are still many artists who are pushing boundaries and experimenting with new sounds. With technology, musicians have more tools than ever to create unique music. Also, genres are blending more than ever before, creating fresh and innovative styles. Every era has its own trends, but that doesn’t mean today’s music is less creative—it’s just different.


7. Streaming platforms are unfair to independent artists.

Opinion 1: I think streaming platforms like Spotify are unfair to independent artists because they don’t pay them enough for their work. Most artists earn only a few cents per stream, which makes it hard for them to make a living from their music. It’s especially tough for independent musicians who don’t have the support of a big record label. They put so much effort into creating their music, but they don’t get paid fairly for it. I believe streaming services should find a way to pay artists more.

Opinion 2: While streaming platforms might not pay much per stream, I think they’re still a good opportunity for independent artists. Before streaming, it was really hard for new artists to get noticed without a record label. Now, they can upload their music and reach listeners all over the world. Even if they don’t make a lot of money from streams, they can still use these platforms to build a fanbase and promote their live shows or merchandise. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than not being heard at all.


8. Music with explicit content should be censored.

Opinion 1: I believe music with explicit content should be censored, especially when it’s played on the radio or in public places. Some lyrics can be really offensive or inappropriate, and not everyone wants to hear that, especially children. Artists can still express themselves, but there should be a way to make sure that explicit content is kept away from places where it could be harmful. Censorship helps protect people from being exposed to language or themes they don’t want to hear.

Opinion 2: I don’t think music with explicit content should be censored because people should have the freedom to express themselves however they want. If someone doesn’t like explicit lyrics, they can choose not to listen to that music. Plus, censoring music might take away from the artist’s original message or meaning. It’s important for people to have the choice to listen to what they want and for artists to have the freedom to create without restrictions.


9. AI-generated music lacks the soul of human-created music.

Opinion 1: I agree that AI-generated music lacks the soul that human-created music has. Music is about emotions and personal experiences, and I don’t think a computer can truly understand that. Even if AI can create a song that sounds good, it’s missing the depth and feeling that comes from a real person’s creativity. Music should be more than just a collection of sounds—it should tell a story or express something real, which is something AI can’t do.

Opinion 2: While AI-generated music might be different from human-created music, I don’t think it necessarily lacks soul. AI can be programmed to create music based on patterns and data from thousands of songs, and sometimes it can produce something really interesting and new. It’s just a different way of making music. Plus, human artists can use AI as a tool to help them create even more creative and innovative music. It’s not about replacing humans, but about exploring new possibilities.


10. The dominance of English in global music is diminishing cultural diversity.

Opinion 1: I think the dominance of English in global music is reducing cultural diversity. When most popular songs are in English, it makes it harder for music in other languages to reach a global audience. This can lead to less exposure for different cultures and their unique sounds. It’s important for people to hear music from all over the world, not just in one language. We should celebrate and promote music in different languages to keep cultural diversity alive.

Opinion 2: On the other hand, I believe that the dominance of English in global music isn’t necessarily diminishing cultural diversity. Many artists from non-English-speaking countries choose to sing in English because it helps them reach a wider audience. But that doesn’t mean they lose their cultural identity. In fact, they often blend English with their own language and style, creating something unique. Plus, with the internet, it’s easier than ever to find and enjoy music in any language, so cultural diversity in music is still very much alive.

Další zadání a vzory k ústní zkoušce z AJ na téma Music (Hudba)

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Vypracovaná maturitní otázka na téma Hudba (Music) – text, otázky a osnova

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Cool slovní zásoba na téma Hudba (Music) k maturitě z angličtiny

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Otevřené maturitní otázky na téma Hudba (Music) a vzorové odpovědi na jedničku

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Popis a porovnávání obrázků anglicky na téma Hudba (Music) a vzor na jedničku

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Dialogy na téma Hudba (Music) a vzorové ukázky na jedničku

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Argumentace na téma Hudba (Music) a vzorové ukázky na výbornou

ČTĚTE TAKÉ: Porovnávání textů na téma Hudba (Music) a vzorová ukázka

maturita-anglictina-amos-itutoring-footer-content

Napsat komentář

Vaše e-mailová adresa nebude zveřejněna. Vyžadované informace jsou označeny *